|
The level of the Sea of Galilee fluctuates regularly each
year. The winter rains can raise it as high as 209 meters below world sea
level. Any higher and it will flood the lower part of Tiberias; the
authorities then open a dam on the southern end, allowing the excess to
enter the lower Jordan, whence it flows to the Dead Sea. During the long dry
summer the level can fall to minus 213 meters or even lower.
The lake did not always reach "minus 209 meters" in winter,
however.
Mendel Nun explains that until about a thousand years ago, the
lake's sole outlet was a channel in the south, 200 meters broad, which
passed around the western edge of a city called Beit Yerach. The whole
southern edge of the lake was made of soft, alluvial soil. The pounding
waves ate some away each year, and this went on for millennia, until they
opened a new channel about a mile to the south of the old. The lower Jordan
then had two "arms" that flowed from the lake, as recorded by a Russian
pilgrim named Daniel in 1106.
Here are Nun's own words:
"The younger stream was deeper, and, therefore, whenever the
lake's water level rose, the younger stream was the first to carry away the
overflow. In the course of time the older stream's activity decreased
because it flowed mainly when the lake's water level was at its highest. The
older stream filled with silt. The younger stream, however, had a smaller
capacity-though deeper, it was only forty meters wide compared with the
200-meter width of the older stream. The younger stream's smaller capacity
led to the continuing rise of the lake's water level. The original outlet
had been able to handle quickly sudden increases in the lake's water level,
thus preventing the lake from rising significantly. The new outlet was
unable to do this.
"To summarize, over the course of the last thousand years,
the phenomenon of the two outlets caused a gradual increase in the lake's
maximum level-to about one meter above the earlier maximum. The rising
waters destroyed wide stretches (up to fifty meters) of the settlements
along the lake's sandy shores. Hardest hit were the ruins of ancient fishing
villages. The devastation can be clearly seen at Kefar Akavya, maritime
Hippos (Susita) and maritime Gadara. Bethsaida [Nun is referring to el-Araj
-SL] also fell victim, shrinking in size dramatically. The destruction of
Bethsaida's coast was especially great because the soil of the lake's
northeastern shore is soft and alluvial and because Bethsaida had two
beaches-one to the southwest, on the lake, and one to the northeast
bordering the swamp along the lagoon, the village's natural harbor." |